Woodmere Properties, Inc. Case Solution
This shows that the company might not generate the margins associated with the past but it would include the cost of expansion in different parts of the country which will allow to reduce the level of profits but could attract the investors for the future benefit through long-term growth.
Management alignment with shareholders
Woodmere’s shares were heavily contributed by the owners and the strong management consist of managers and directors. Therefore,the acquisition might allow to reduce the size of management control and to allow the new independent shareholders to participate in the company’s overall profits. This would help to reduce the risk of control and to manage the contribution among the management as well as shareholders.
Analysis of reported data given by the company
Exhibit 5c shows that how much area Woodmere acquired from its inception and what the annual return through these acquisition. Moreover, it also illustrates that the total properties acquired by Woodmere were 268, which shows that the business was highly involved to expand the size of operations into different regions of U.S. whereas, the annualized rate of return was much better than other big real estate businesses.
Exhibit 5d defines the shares value in the past two years and shows that it would likely to increase according to the demand of the industry and could attract the shareholders related to the performance.
Exhibit 5e clearly shows the expected operations of post-acquisition, it is a prospectus to provide the related information to the existing as well as the potential shareholders. The information included the level of activities involved in the rentals and other sources of income and the expenditure allowed to increase the size of operations in order to have high yield volumes and earnings.
Acquisition of other companies and the potential risk of the growth strategy
The benefit gain through the acquisition of Lanier do not mean that this strategy would apply for the other companies as Lanier realty trust was an already established entity.Therefore, the acquisition would allow to expand the size of operations and to meet the criteria under business strategy model.
However, the same strategy might not apply for the other acquisition because the company knew that other real estate business could not provide the positive results according to the poor performance as compared to Woodmere.
If the acquisition with other companies would take place, then it could negatively affectthe company’s overall performance, which might lead to a loss for the investorsas well as it could also drive towards the risk of liquidity according to the expected market situation of real estate business.
Therefore,in order to acquire other businesses, the company should implement different business strategy along with the decision given by the existing shareholders about the future gain or loss of the business.
Exhibit 1
Trading of Shares | ||||
 Total shares sold |  Per share Value |  Total price of shares sold |  Purchase of Lanier |  Capital expenditure |
                    10,000,000 |                                                   27 |                                 268,750,000 |                 297,000,000 |                     (28,250,000) |
                    11,500,000 |                                                   25 |                                 292,847,500 |                 297,000,000 |                       (4,152,500) |
Exhibit 2
Free cash flows | Â |
EBIT | 98547 |
Add: depreciation | 25024 |
Less: capital expenditure | 28250 |
FCF | 95321 |
Terminal Value | 1411278.564 |
Total FCF | 1506599.564 |
WACC | 11% |
NPV | $1,356,999 |
EBITDA Multiples | 268,761 |
Exhibit 3
WACC | Â |
ke | 14% |
kd | 11% |
Vd | 0.472317589 |
Ve | 0.527682411 |
Tax | 30% |
WACC | 11% |
Exhibit 4
Internal operation analysis | |
Operation Calculators | Total Value |
FFO (Funds from operations) | 117083 |
Cap Rate | 6.98% |
NOI | 98547 |
Net Asset Value | 70.808 |
Multiple | 2 |
FFO per Share | 4598 |
Yield on FFO | 18.89% |
Debt to asset ratio | 0.450 |
Debt to Equity ratio | 0.936 |
Debt coverage ratio | 0.178 |
Breakeven occupancy rate | 3.55 |
…………….
This is just a sample partial work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution
Related Case Solutions:









