caseism

United States and Thailand: Diplomatic Wrangles in the War on Human Trafficking Case Solution & Answer

In early 2010, Robert Griffiths, Economic Counselor of the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok, prepared for the possibility of serious diplomatic consequences with the Thai government. Griffiths was responsible for providing analysis on human trafficking in Thailand for the annual State Department report on U.S. human trafficking, but with a steady increase of victims of trafficking, Thailand was in danger of being in the “list” State Department countries of sufficient progress. For the government of Thailand, which prided itself on its fight against human trafficking, to be placed on the watch list of the United States would be humiliation for a lifelong friend. And Griffiths, a senior representative of the U.S. Foreign Service of Thailand, which angered the host government would endanger not only the future cooperation against trafficking, but also important commitments on trade, intellectual property and security. The case describes the harsh reality of the fight against trafficking in human beings, even when close allies like the U.S. and Thailand share the same aspirations. With a depth profile of the laws of the United States against global human trafficking, the case can be seen inside the diplomatic mission of the two countries in 2010. 1991.0 cases
by
John D. Donahue,
Anjani Datla
Source: Harvard Kennedy School
May 16 2013: release date. Prod #: HKS755-PDF-ENG
United States and Thailand: diplomatic disputes in the war against the solution trafficking case

Share This

LOOK FOR A FREE CASE STUDY SOLUTION

JUST REGISTER NOW AND GET 50% OFF ON EACH CASE STUDY