The Hormone Therapy Controversy: What Makes Reliable Evidence Case Solution

This Case is about HEALTH, MARKET RESEARCH, POLICY, RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

PUBLICATION DATE: November 13, 2013 PRODUCT #: HKS775-PDF-ENG

For approximately two decades, the top signs on hormone therapy were predicated on findings from observational studies such as the Nurses’ Health Study. In year 1985, researchers at the Nurses’ Health Study asserted that postmenopausal women who receive estrogen had lower rates of heart ailment than women who had by no means taken the hormone.

These findings that were authoritative and facilitated driving the upsurge in hormone prescriptions in the 1980s and 1990s. However in a spectacular turn around, in 2002, research workers for a randomized clinical trial called the Women’s Health Initiative reported that hormone therapy, actually, raised the danger of stroke and cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal women. For millions of girls who declined therapy or were abruptly taken off hormones, however, the sensation of misery and confusion lingered.
The Hormone Therapy Controversy What Makes Reliable Evidence case solution

At the center of the hormone therapy controversy was the undeniable fact that two distinct research strategies randomized experiments and observational studies, had arrived at diametrically opposite effects, once again raising questions about what made up signs that is trustworthy. Instance Amount 2005.0

The Hormone Therapy Controversy: What Makes Reliable Evidence Case Solution
Share This