LINEAR PROGRAMMING ASSIGNMENT Case Solution
Problem 4
We are presented with:
z = 10 + x2 + x4− w2 x1 = 1 –
x2− w2 x3 = 3 − 3x2 + 4x4 + w2
w3 = 5 + x2− x4− w2
a).
The entering variables for the above standard form problem would be x1. The leaving variables using the minimum ratio test would be:
x2− w2 x3 +3×2 +4×4+w2 = 3  ————— (3/3 = 1)
w3 – x2 +x4 +w2 = 5 ——————-(5/1=5)
The leaving variable with the minimum ratio would be w2.
b).
If Bland’s rule is used, then x1 and w2 would be chosen again.
Problem 5
The answer for this part is as follows:
Solution | ||||
 | (a) | (b) | ( c) | |
i | Feasible basic solution | Yes | Yes | Yes |
ii | Optimal basic solution | No | No | No |
iii | unbounded problem | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
iv | infeasible problem | No | No | No |
Problem 6
The initial LP model is :
Min x1 + 3x2 + x3 + 4x4
- t.
x1− x2 + 2x4− x5 = 4
2x1 + x4− 4x5 ≥−4 x2 + 3x3 + 2x4 + x5 = 2
x1,x2,x3,x4,x5 ≥ 0
Rearranging each constraint, so that the right hand side is equal to 0.
x1− x2 + 2x4− x5 – 4 = 0
2x1 + x4− 4x5 –s1 −4 x2 + 3x3 + 2x4 + x5 – 2= 0
Then we define the non-negative dual variable for each inequality constraint and unrestricted dual variable for each equality constraint,
Min x1 + 3x2 + x3 + 4x4
+ λ1 (x1− x2 + 2x4− x5 – 4)
+ λ2 (2x1 + x4− 4x5 –s1 −4 x2 + 3x3 + 2x4 + x5 – 2)
This is the formulation of the duality and finally we rewrite the objective function as:
Minimize: 4(a-b) λ1 + 3(a+b)λ2-4a-4b
Subject to:
-16/4λ1- 20/4λ2 = -20/4
4 λ1 – 5λ2 = 5
The above formulation is optimal for this problem.
Problem 7
a)
For the values of a= 1 and b= 1 we will have a unique optimal solution.
b)
For the values of a=1 and b= 0 we will have many optimal solutions.
c)
For the values of a= 0 and b= 0 we will have no feasible solution.
d)
For the values of a=0 and b= 1, the solution would be unbounded…..
This is just a sample partial work. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution
Related Case Solutions:









