This Case is about HEALTH, LEADERSHIP, STRATEGY, TECHNOLOGY
PUBLICATION DATE: April 04, 2011 PRODUCT #: HKS874-PDF-ENG
It’s well suited for a course on tactical direction. $2 billion in other funds to deal with particular barriers to widespread acquisition of well-being IT systems. * Comprehensive regulatory authority to define “significant use” and establish certification standards. In addition, it describes Blumenthal’s important challenge: to carry a large number of hospitals and thousands and tens of thousands of physicians-many of them cynical-that health IT systems were worth the time and trouble it would take to get them and incorporate them into daily clinical practice.
Modest, cash strapped community hospitals and individual professionals recognized a special concern. Eventually, it describe the character of the regulatory job of Blumenthal: to reach the proper balance and to define significant use straight away. Define significant use too firmly, and the extended motivators might be turned down by large quantities of health care providers. Define it too freely, as well as the national initiative that is high-priced would provide little more in relation to the marketplace would have created anyway. The case could be utilized alone. HKS Instance Number 1938.0.