caseism

Governance and Sustainability at Nike (A) Case Solution & Answer

Two members of the management team must decide what are the sustainability objectives to provide Nike Nike CEO and the Committee of responsibility are corporate board of Nike. Set in 2012, which traces the evolution of the Nike approach to environmental and social concerns of its origins in the student protests against working conditions in the supply chain in the 1990s by developing a corporate responsibility in the board (CR) Committee in 2001 to the creation of sustainable business strategy and Innovation (SB & I) in 2009. In this context, Hannah Jones, VP of Nike SB and I and Eric Sprunk, vice president of merchandising and product working to finalize next set of objectives for sustainable business development for submission to the CR Committee. When Nike signs on the way to zero, an initiative of Greenpeace inspiration to eliminate the release of toxic chemicals into the water supply by 2020, the process of establishing business goals becomes more complex. Jones and Sprunk must decide whether to recommend that Nike mark behind other sustainable development goals for the challenge of zero toxic substances, where their commitment to zero toxic substances, or find another solution.
by
Lynn S. Paine,
-Nien Hsieh,
Lara Adamsons
Source: Harvard Business School
19 pages.
Release: June 17, 2013. Prod #: 313146-PDF-ENG
Governance and Sustainable Development at Nike (A) Case Solution

Share This

LOOK FOR A FREE CASE STUDY SOLUTION

JUST REGISTER NOW AND GET 50% OFF ON EACH CASE STUDY