Contracting for Management and Technical Services (A): Who’s Been Running the Naval Sea Systems Command? Case Solution
This Case is about ETHICS, NEGOTIATIONS, OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
PUBLICATION DATE: January 01, 1990
During April 1988, The Naval Sea Systems Command (NavSea) happened to come on the hit list of the naval inspector general for its own extreme dependence on specialists to perform daily features in assistance of its objective: the achievement, upkeep, innovation, and even deactivation of the Navy’s ships and on-board devices. In the event of a routine check, the inspector general discovered that numerous NavSea agreements had actually not clearly mentioned the performance requirements while the contractors were carrying out sensitive activities, such that should be reserved to government employees with duty for safeguarding the general public interest. The inspector general’s report stated that the NavSea should lower the use of contractor support services by a 50 percent decrement. NavSea authorities silently set concerning evaluating private agreements and prepping a reaction to the report, however the issue was not predestined to stay peaceful for lengthy. On June 14, press reporters broke the story of Procedure Ill Wind, a two-year investigation into unlawful dealings amongst Navy and various other Pentagon authorities, defense specialists, and private experts.
Related Case Solutions:
Naval Air Station Kodiak
The San Francisco Foundation: The Dilemma of the Buck Trust (B)
Mittal Steel in 2006: Changing the Steel Game
Nokia: The Burning Platform
Pak Sweets: Managing a Diverse Workforce
Schneider Electric: Becoming the Global Specialist in Energy Management
James Abrams at Clockwork Home Services Inc.: Lessons from a Serial Entrepreneur
Target Corporation: Ackman versus the Board
Mistake-Proofing Healthcare: Why Stopping Processes May be a Good Start
Miami-Dade County and Sea Level Rise, Sequel