This Case is about EMERGING MARKETS, GLOBALIZATION, GOVERNMENT, SUPPLY CHAIN
PUBLICATION DATE: January 24, 2008 PRODUCT #: HKU710-PDF-ENG
The renminbi are perceived by them as an unjust weapon in international contest. Chinese officials reacted that these strikes were groundless: the renminbi was not undervalued, at least not substantially. The peg led to keeping a secure economic environment, which helped all economical associates. Additionally they said that, if a substantial trade and budget deficit was running, it was partially attributable to capital inflow from China. The US should concentrate on the weaknesses of its own market that created these deficits, rather than treating China as a scapegoat. Officials also said that China was a autonomous nation with the right to select its exchange rate policy. In the news, the discussion was often throughout 2005 to 2007 and it was not unlikely that disagreements would become more demanding if European trade deficits with China and US continued to grow.
Related Case Solutions:
Chinas Renminbi: Our Currency Your Problem
Chinas Trade Disputes
China: To Float or Not to Float (F): Alcatel and Strong Chinese Competition
The Globalization of the Renminbi: Feeling the Stones on the River Bed
Citibanks Co-Operative Strategy in China: The Renminbi Debit Card
Citibank’s Co-Operative Strategy in China: The Renminbi Debit Card
China: To Float or Not to Float? (C ): Esquel Group and the Chinese Renminbi, Spanish Version
China: To Float or Not to Float? (B): Timeline of Changes Relevant to the Chinese Renminbi, Spanish Version
China: To Float or Not to Float (C ): Esquel Group and the Chinese Renminbi
China: To Float or Not to Float (B): Timeline of Changes Relevant to the Chinese Renminbi